Wednesday, 1 February 2012

Starting Windows Workflow v4.0

Today I've started learning about Windows Workflow v4.0, I'm hoping that it will help out with a current project. The original requirement was for mapping real world business processes to what would normally be complex long running computer tasks. Whilst investigating what it could do I'm beginning to think there could be real value using it for any task that requires process flow logic, even extremely short lived ones. This could be controlling page flow through a web application, or even defining the complex logic that can sometimes end up making MVC controller actions fatter than they really should be.

For getting me started a really good starting point has been the MSDN WF4.0 videos under the beginners guide, if you have a PluralSite subscription, Matt Milner presents some really useful stuff too.

As well as just learning the basics of Workflow; what really interests me is how it should be architected in a real world LOB application; taking into account the usual "-bility" issues, Scalability, Maintainability and Reliability.

  • The biggest challenge will probably be understanding how to manage multiple long running workflows that have many external dependencies inside a service that can paused, stopped, restarted and on a server that can obviously be rebooted or even crash. How does the server restart and reload all the workflows it was managing.
  • Building from that, how would this all work in a load balanced environment where you may even have 2 or more of these services running sharing the load - maybe a workflow that is started on one server will be persisted / unloaded when it becomes idle and then restarted on another server.
  • How can a workflow task be passed between different layers of a system, so it may be started on as part of a web request from a user and passed to a service to be completed a long running task.
As I start investigating each of these issues I'm hoping that this group of MSDN articles might be a good starting point.

No comments:

Post a Comment