Skip to main content

Looking forward to 2013

First and foremost, the biggest change in 2013 is that I will be responsible for and managing the development team. To help the team with the challenges we will face in 2013 I will need to stay hand on too, so that should make time management critical just to make sure I can personally fit it all in. This will probably be the biggest challenge I have faced in the last few years and something that I'm looking forward to getting started with.

Another change for 2013 will be refining our agile process. For the 2nd half of 2012 we followed a scrum methodology, successfully developing and deploying an MVC replacement for an old ASP legacy application. Feedback from the technical teams resulted in us modifying the process, removing task hour estimation from the sprint planning session with no measurable negative effect. Additional feedback from the business indicated that sprints were causing some friction when defining stories and planning releases. The 6-9 month development cycles of waterfall just don't work for most software applications, but at the same time, the artificial barriers that an 'x' week sprint causes can confuse the business. As we'd come to similar conclusions in my previous role, we are going to try to develop a "Kanban" methodology that will work for us.

  • We want to keep the short and frequent feedback loops and engagement with the business.
  • We also want to keep most stories as small as they can possibly be (days rather than weeks), but for some functionality we just don't want to be forced to break up a story just to make it fit within a sprint (but I must stress that we hope these to be the exception, otherwise it is just waterfall by the back door).
  • We also want to look into releasing at the end of every story so the business can get the value of development work as quickly as possible.

To help the business adjust to the harsh economic climate that we still face, the biggest challenge is going to be making sure that every single bit of effort really counts! This really does include everything, we need to improve the deployment process of all our application suite, making sure we really can live continuous integration / deployment. All development work needs to address both existing bugs / performance issues whilst providing much needed new functionality. As a part of this we should get the chance to learn Puppet, refine our TeamCity skills, potentially look at a DVCS and most importantly have fun developing!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Mocking HttpCookieCollection in HttpRequestBase

When unit testing ASP.NET MVC2 projects the issue of injecting HttpContext is quickly encountered.  There seem to be many different ways / recommendations for mocking HttpContextBase to improve the testability of controllers and their actions.  My investigations into that will probably be a separate blog post in the near future but for now I want to cover something that had me stuck for longer than it probably should have.  That is how to mock non abstract/interfaced classes within HttpRequestBase and HttpResponseBase – namely the HttpCookieCollection class.   The code sample below illustrates how it can be used within a mocked instance of HttpRequestBase.  Cookies can be added / modified within the unit test code prior to being passed into the code being tested.   After it’s been called, using a combination of MOQ’s Verify and NUnit’s Assert it is possible to check how many times the collection is accessed (but you have to include the set up calls) and that the relevant cookies have …

Injecting HttpContextBase into an MVC Controller

It is a shame that when the ASP.NET MVC framework was released they did not think to build IoC support into the infrastructure. All the major components of the MVC engine appear to magically inherit instances of HttpContext and it’s related objects – which can cause no end of problems if you are trying to utilise Unit Testing and IoC. Reading around various articles on the subject just to get around this one problem requires the implementation of several different concepts and you are still left with a work around. The code below, along with the other links referenced in this article is my stab at resolving the issue. There’s probably nothing new here, but it does attempt to relate all the information needed to do this for Castle Windsor. The overview is that all controllers will need to inherit from a base controller, which takes an instance of HttpContext into it’s constructor. It then overrides the property HttpContext in the main controller class, supplying it’s own version…

Unit Testing Workflow Code Activities - Part 1

When I first started looking into Windows Workflow one of the first things that I liked about it was how it separated responsibilities. The workflow was responsible for handling the procedural logic with all it's conditional statements, etc. Whilst individual code activities could be written to handle the business logic processing; created in small easily re-usable components. To try and realise my original perception this series of blog posts will cover the unit testing of bespoke code activities; broken down into: Part One: Unit testing a code activity with a (generic) cast return type (this post)Part Two: Unit testing a code activity that assigns it's (multiple) output to "OutArguments" (Not yet written)So to make a start consider the following really basic code activity; it expects an InArgument<string> of "Input" and returns a string containing the processed output; in this case a reverse copy of the value held in "Input".namespace Ex…